Live product walkthrough
gxptechnology.com · Ahmedabad, India

Documentation and quality systems, built to hold up under inspection.

Software for pharmaceutical, biologics and healthcare organisations that need their GMP environment — batch records, deviations, CAPA, validation — to stay inspection-ready every single day, not just before an audit.

See the compliance map
Engineered to 21 CFR Part 11 & 211 · EU GMP Annex 1 & 15 · ICH Q9
Controlled copy BR-2291 · REV 04
Batch Production Record
Product
Amoxicillin 500mg
Batch No.
B-240119-A
Line
Filling Line 2
Stage
In-process check
Fill weight (mL) — corrected entry
10.2 10.4 Corrected
R.D. · 09:14:07 IST · Reason: transcription error, verified against raw balance printout
E-signature
R. Deshpande
Approval — released for distribution · §11.50
Audit trail
Mapped to five regulatory frameworks
21 CFR §11
21 CFR §211
EU GMP Annex 1
EU GMP Annex 15
ICH Q9
Annex 11 · ALCOA+

For Quality teams

Run batch release, deviations and CAPA from one connected system, with approvals routed the way your SOPs already require.

For Validation & CSV engineers

Generate risk-based IQ/OQ/PQ scripts from your URS, and get audit-trail evidence for every configuration change.

For Auditors & inspectors

A read-only, timestamped record of who did what and why — structured so a records request takes minutes, not days.

A modern platform for GMP compliance.

Quality documentation, computerised system validation and applied AI aren't separate tools bolted together — they read and write to the same validated data layer.

GMP Documentation & eQMS

SOPs, batch records, deviations, CAPA, change control and training — versioned, routed and e-signed in one connected quality management system.

  • Electronic batch records with in-line calculation checks
  • Deviation → CAPA linkage with ICH Q9 risk scoring
  • Controlled-document lifecycle: draft, review, effective, retire
  • Training assignment tied to current SOP version

Validation & Computerised Systems

CSV/CSA documentation, e-signatures and audit trails engineered to Part 11 and Annex 11 from day one.

Test scriptOQ-118
StatusExecuted
Evidence3 files attached

Deep AI for Healthcare

Document intelligence, anomaly detection and predictive risk scoring — always with a human decision-maker in the loop.

Every module

One connected toolkit, not eleven separate logins.

Each module below writes to the same validated data layer — so a nonconformance opened on the floor is already linked to the CAPA, the document, and the training record it touches.

Nonconformance Management

Capture out-of-spec material or process output at the point it's found, with disposition and root cause routed straight into CAPA.

Learn more & regulatory basis
NC-2291 disposition recorded — RejectRoot cause linked to CAPA-0451

CAPA Management

Root-cause analysis, corrective and preventive actions, and effectiveness checks tracked end to end with owners and due dates.

Learn more & regulatory basis
CAPA-0451 effectiveness check due3 CAPAs closed this week

Document Management

Controlled authoring, review and e-signature for SOPs and records, with version history that can't be edited after the fact.

Learn more & regulatory basis
SOP-QA-014 rev. 6 made effective12 documents currently in review

Change Management

Impact assessment, approvals and implementation tracking for process, equipment and document changes, in one auditable workflow.

Learn more & regulatory basis
CR-3092 approvedImpact assessment: low risk

Audit Management

Plan internal and supplier audits, capture findings on the spot, and push every finding straight into a tracked CAPA.

Learn more & regulatory basis
AU-118 finding linked to CAPA-0452Supplier audit scheduled — 14 days

Training Management

Curricula tied to current SOP versions, so a document revision automatically reopens training for everyone it affects.

Learn more & regulatory basis
18 users assigned SOP-QA-014 trainingTraining compliance: 96%

Calibration Management

Scheduled calibration and preventive maintenance for instruments and equipment, with automatic due-date escalation.

Learn more & regulatory basis
IS-04 calibration due in 12 daysOQ-118 executed for Isolator IS-04

Maintenance Management

Asset registers, work orders and downtime history connected to the same quality record as the batches those assets touched.

Learn more & regulatory basis
WO-2207 completed — Filling Line 2Asset uptime: 99.2%
Compliance map

Five frameworks. One control set.

Rather than bolting compliance on after the fact, every workflow, form and permission in the platform traces back to a specific regulatory clause — so your validation package can point to exactly where a control lives.

21 CFR §11

Electronic Records & Signatures

Audit trails, access controls and legally binding e-signatures modelled directly on §11.10 and §11.50 — every entry tied to a user, a timestamp, and a reason.

21 CFR §211

cGMP for Finished Pharmaceuticals

Batch production records, laboratory controls, and equipment logs structured to Subpart F and J — built for the paperwork FDA investigators actually pull.

EU GMP Annex 1

Sterile Medicinal Products

Contamination control strategy documentation, environmental monitoring trends and interventions logged against the 2022 revision's CCS requirements.

EU GMP Annex 15

Qualification & Validation

URS, DQ, IQ, OQ, PQ and periodic review templates that generate a traceable validation lifecycle for equipment, systems and processes.

ICH Q9

Quality Risk Management

FMEA and risk-ranking tools built into deviation, change control and CAPA workflows, so risk assessment isn't a separate spreadsheet exercise.

Annex 11 · ALCOA+

Computerised Systems & Data Integrity

Attributable, legible, contemporaneous, original, accurate records by default — the same data-integrity backbone that Annex 11 and Part 11 both call for.

NOTE Software can support compliance — it doesn't replace your Quality Unit's judgment. Configuration is validated jointly with your QA team as part of onboarding, and every deployment ships with an IQ/OQ evidence package for your own validation file.
Validation lifecycle

How a deployment actually gets validated.

This is the real sequence your Quality Unit signs off on — not a marketing timeline. Each stage produces evidence that feeds your own validation master plan.

01 / ASSESS

Gap & risk assessment

We map your current SOPs and systems against Part 11, Part 211, Annex 1, Annex 15 and ICH Q9.

02 / CONFIGURE

Workflow configuration

Forms, approval chains and e-signature routing configured — no custom code — against your URS.

03 / VALIDATE

IQ / OQ / PQ execution

Qualification scripts run jointly with your QA team, producing signed evidence for your validation file.

04 / OPERATE

Live GMP operations

Batch records, deviations, CAPA and training run in production, captured to the audit trail in real time.

05 / MONITOR

Continuous review

Scheduled periodic review, access recertification and trend analysis keep the system current.

Deep AI for healthcare

AI that reads your quality data — and shows its work.

Deviation reports, environmental monitoring trends and batch history accumulate faster than any Quality Unit can manually review. Our models surface what's worth a human's attention, with the source record always one click away.

  • 01 Document intelligence — search and summarise SOPs, deviations and CAPA records in plain language, with citations back to the source document.
  • 02 Anomaly detection — flags unusual environmental monitoring or process trends against historical baselines, before they become an OOS result.
  • 03 Predictive risk scoring — ranks open batches and deviations by likelihood of escalation, so QA reviewers triage the highest-risk items first.
  • 04 Submission drafting support — assembles first-draft narrative sections from structured batch and validation data for regulatory review.

Every AI-generated output is labelled, versioned and routed for human QA review before it becomes part of a GxP record — models are validated as computerised systems in their own right, not treated as a black box exception to Part 11.

Modeldeviation-risk-v3
Input recordDEV-2291
Risk bandElevated
Confidence
Reviewed byQA · pending
Similar precedentDEV-1187, DEV-0942
Suggested CAPAAuto-drafted
Audit ref§11.10(e)
Built for

Regulated manufacturing and care delivery, in one platform.

Sterile manufacturing
Biologics & biotech
Medical devices
CDMOs & contract labs
Hospitals & health systems
About us

Compliance, built as a continuous discipline — not a periodic scramble.

GxP Technology Private Limited is an AI-powered, cloud quality management software provider for pharmaceutical, biologics and healthcare organisations. We help quality, regulatory and manufacturing teams turn GMP compliance from a periodic scramble into a continuous, defensible discipline — one where every record is inspection-ready the day it's created, not the week before an audit.

Our platform brings the core processes of a quality organisation — batch records, deviations, CAPA, document control, training, change management, supplier quality and audits — into a single connected environment, instead of scattered spreadsheets and disconnected point tools. Workflows that used to mean chasing signatures across departments now route, escalate and close themselves, with a complete, timestamped audit trail behind every action.

We built the platform around the regulations our customers actually get inspected against: 21 CFR Part 11 and Part 211, EU GMP Annex 1 and Annex 15, and ICH Q9 risk management, so each workflow, permission and e-signature traces back to a specific clause rather than a best guess. Layered on top is Deep AI for Healthcare — document intelligence, anomaly detection and predictive risk scoring — designed to help Quality teams spot what needs attention sooner, always with a human reviewer in the loop before an AI output becomes part of a GxP record.

Since our founding, GxP Technology has worked with sterile manufacturers, biologics developers, CDMOs and healthcare providers who need software that reduces regulatory risk rather than adding to it. Our platform is built cloud-native, with enterprise-grade security and the flexibility to scale from a single site to a multi-facility quality organisation.

We believe compliance software should make the Quality Unit's judgment easier to act on — not replace it. That belief shapes every feature we ship.

On the record

The design philosophy behind the platform.

"The question we ask about any new feature isn't whether it's convenient — it's whether it would hold up in front of an investigator. That's the bar."
Head of Product GXPTECH · ON DESIGN PHILOSOPHY
"Most eQMS tools digitise a paper process and call it done. We started from the inspection checklist and built backwards from there."
Head of Compliance Engineering GXPTECH · ON PRODUCT STRATEGY
Before you ask

Questions QA leads actually ask us.

If your question isn't here, it becomes the first item on the gap-assessment call.

Does the software replace our Quality Unit's judgment?

No. The platform enforces workflow, routing and audit-trail integrity — every deviation disposition, CAPA closure and batch release still requires a qualified reviewer's signature. We provide the guardrails; your QU makes the call.

How long does validation actually take?

Typical gap assessment through PQ sign-off runs 8–14 weeks depending on site complexity and how many legacy SOPs need remapping. You get a firm timeline after the 02 / CONFIGURE stage, once your URS is locked.

Can it integrate with our LIMS, MES or ERP?

Yes — validated API and file-based integrations exist for common LIMS, MES and ERP platforms. Each integration point ships with its own IQ/OQ evidence, since interfaces are GxP-relevant too.

What happens to our records if we ever migrate off the platform?

A full export in a vendor-neutral, human-readable format (PDF/A plus structured data) is available on demand — not held hostage at contract end. Your audit trail leaves with your records.

Is the AI layer itself validated, or is it a black box?

The models are treated as computerised systems in their own right — versioned, tested against defined acceptance criteria, and every output routed for human QA review before it touches a GxP record.

Ready to make your next inspection a formality?

Tell us about your site, your current systems, and which frameworks you need to demonstrate. We'll walk through a gap assessment before you commit to anything.

hr@gxptechnology.com